Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Silodosin and Tadalafil in Synthetic Mixture
Amitkumar J. Vyas1, Anjali V. Ramani1*, Harshal M. Vadile1, Ajay I. Patel1,
Ashvin V. Dudhrejiya1, Sunny R. Shah2, Urvi J. Chotaliya1,Shweta Prajapati1, Devang B. Sheth3
1B. K. Mody Government Pharmacy College, Rajkot - 360003, Gujarat, India.
2Government Pharmacy College, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
3L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: amitvyas77@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
This study developed an RP-HPLC method to simultaneously determine Silodosin and Tadalafil. Using a Thermo BDS C18 column with a mobile phase of dipotassium hydrogen phosphate buffer and acetonitrile (60:40), the method achieved retention times of 2.905 minutes for Silodosin and 5.082 minutes for Tadalafil. The method exhibited excellent linearity with a correlation coefficient of 0.999 for both drugs, with Silodosin ranging from 1.6-200µg/mL and Tadalafil from 1-125µg/mL. The accuracy was between 99.24% and 100.97% for Silodosin and 99.92% and 100.13% for Tadalafil. The limits of detection were 0.40µg/mL for Silodosin and 0.20µg/mL for Tadalafil, while the limits of quantification were 1.21µg/mL and 0.63µg/mL, respectively. This method is precise and accurate, making it suitable for routine analysis of these drugs.
KEYWORDS: Force Degradation, Hydrolysis, ICH Guideline (Q2R1), Silodosin, Tadalafil.
INTRODUCTION:
Silodosin (SLD) Structure21 shown in figure 1. Silodosin is Alpha 1 Antagonist used in treatment of BPH (Benign prostatic hyperplasia)23 Tadalafil (TLD) is Structure22 shown in figure 2. Tadalafil is Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor used in treatment of ED (Erectile Dysfunction).
The goal of stability and related substance analysis is to illustrate how various environmental conditions affect the quality of a drug substance or drug product over time.1,2. Pharmaceutical quality control relies significantly on HPLC, UV Spectrophotometric, and LC-MS/MS techniques, as the stability and integrity of substances are crucial for their efficacy and safety3-13. The stability and pharmacological efficacy of APIs and are impacted by the presence of contaminants.14-18.
CCD and AQbD, support regulatory compliance. For the development of RP-HPLC procedures, stress testing, or stability-indicating techniques 19-20.
Fig. 1: Chemical structure of silodosin Molecular Formula: C25H32F3N3O4 Molecular Weight: 495.534 g/mol IUPAC Name: 1-(3-hydroxypropy)-5-[2R)-2-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy) phenoxyl] ethylaminol] propyl]-2,3-dihydroindole-7-carboxamide
Fig. 2: Chemical structure of Tadalafil Molecular Formula: C22H19/N304 Molecular Weight: 389.41g/mol IUPAC Name: (6R-12aR)-6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hrxahydro-2-methyl-pyrazino(1’,2’:1,6.) pyrido (3,4-b) indole 1,4-dione
A search of the literature indicated that while there is an HPLC technique available for combination24, there is no single approach published for stability showing simultaneous measurement of Silodosin and Tadalafil. There were few analytical methods reported for Silodosin such as UV25 spectroscopy, UPLC26, LC-MS, RP-HPLC27, ESI-LC-MS28 and RP-HPLC (stability indication method)29 method reported for Silodosin in combination with others30-31 There were few analytical methods reported for Tadalafil such as UV spectroscopy 32, RP-HPLC33-36, UPLC, LC-MS-MS37 and RP-HPLC 38-39 (stability indicating method) reported for Tadalafil in combination with others.
EXPERIMENTAL:
Materials and Instrumentation:
A std. sample of Silodosin was a gracious gift by Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Vadodara and Tadalafil was kindly gifted by Century Pharmaceuticals, Vadodara and Sidesaddle Pharmaceuticals, Ahmedabad. The method was developed using HPLC.
Optimized chromatographic condition:
Isocratic elution mode was utilized for chromatographic separation with Thermo BDS C18 (250mm × 4.6mm, 5 µ) column and M.Phase used the composition of 20mM Dipotassium hydrogen Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile (60:40v/v). A 20µl injection volume was used. 40ºC was the temperature chosen for the column oven. A 1.5 ml/min flow rate was used. 220nm was chosen as the UV detector's detecting wavelength.
PREPARATION OF SOLUTIONS:
METHOD VALIDATION:
The proposed method's analytical validation parameters were established in accordance with the ICH Q2(R1) recommendation.40
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
For chromatographic separation, an isocratic elution method was implemented with the following parameters: a Thermo BDS C18 column (250mm × 4.6 mm, 5µm), a mobile phase of 20mM dipotassium hydrogen phosphate buffer and acetonitrile (60:40 v/v), an injection volume of 20µl, a column oven temperature of 40°C, a flow rate of 1.5ml/min, and a UV detection wavelength of 220nm.
Fig. 3. Optimized Chromatogram of Standard Silodosin and Tadalafil
System Suitability Parameter:
They are acceptable as shown in Table no. 1
Table 1. System Suitability Parameter of Optimized Condition
|
Peak |
Retention time (min) |
Theoretical plate |
Tailing factor |
Resolution |
|
SLD |
2.905 |
10400 |
1.36 |
15.60 |
|
TLD |
5.082 |
15161 |
0.94 |
FORCED DEGRADATION STUDIES:
Degradation study is acceptable as % degradation is less than 30 and all degradation peaks were separated from other peaks. The order of degradation was Acid hydrolysis > Oxidative degradation > Thermal degradation > Photolytic degradation > Base hydrolysis. Figure 4 and results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Forced degradation summary
|
Degradation Condition |
Procedure |
(R.T) (min) (SLD) |
% Degradation (TLD) |
Peak Angle (SLD) |
Peak Threshold (TLD) |
|
Acid Degradation |
80 mg of Silodosin and 50 mg of Tadalafil in 100 ml flask with 5 ml of 1 N HCl for 8 hours. Neutralized with 5 ml of 1 N NaOH, diluted with methanol, and filtered. |
3.199 |
5.273 |
20.88 |
28.25 |
|
Base Degradation |
Similar to acid degradation, but with 5 ml of 1 N NaOH for 8 hours, then neutralized with 5 ml of 1 N HCl, diluted with methanol, and filtered. |
2.879 |
4.963 |
9.08 |
5.14 |
|
Oxidative Degradation |
Silodosin and Tadalafil treated with 3% H₂O₂ for 1.5 hours, then diluted with methanol. |
2.879 |
4.963 |
7.81 |
26.06 |
|
Thermal Degradation |
Standard powders of Silodosin and Tadalafil placed in hot air oven at 80°C for 24 hours. |
2.879 |
4.963 |
8.96 |
18.38 |
|
Photolytic Degradation |
Powders exposed to UV light achieving 1.2 million LUX.hr in a photostability chamber for 24 hours. |
2.879 |
4.963 |
3.51 |
15.6 |
Fig. 4: Forced degradation chromatogram of (A) Acid degradation (B) Base degradation (c) Oxidative degradation (d) Photo degradation (E) Thermal degradation (F) Standard
Linearity:
Linear responses were found for SILO in the concentration range of 1.6-200µg/mL and Tadalafil in the concentration range of 1-125µg/mL. Figures 5 calibration curves for Silodosin and Tadalafil respectively.
Specificity:
It is proved that there is no any interference of excipient with the peak of Silodosin and Tadalafil by comparing the chromatogram of blank, mobile phase, and standard solution
Table 3. Accuracy and Precision data of SLD and TLD
|
Level % |
Accuracy |
Precision |
||||||
|
% Drug recovery |
RSD |
|||||||
|
Repeatability |
Intra-day |
Inter-day |
||||||
|
SLD |
TLD |
SLD |
TLD |
SLD |
TLD |
SLD |
TLD |
|
|
50 |
98.40 |
98.33 |
0.052 |
0.056 |
0.631 |
0.878 |
0.424 |
0.630 |
|
100 |
99.46 |
99.28 |
0.911 |
1.506 |
0.434 |
1.721 |
||
|
150 |
98.00 |
100.08 |
0.176 |
0.184 |
0.176 |
1.062 |
||
Fig. 5. Calibration curve of Silodosin and Tadalafil
Accuracy:
The findings shown in Table 3 indicate that the % recovery for Tadalafil and Silodosin.
Precision:
The method is precise as RSD and was found to be less than 2. Results are shown in Table 3.
LOD and LOQ:
For SLD and TLD, the LOD was determined to be 0.40µg/mL and 0.20µg/mL, respectively. For SLD and TLD, the LOQ was determined to be 1.21µg/mL and 0.63µg/mL, respectively.
Robustness:
When various parameters including flow rate, mobile phase, and temperature were purposefully altered, it was discovered that the approach was reliable. When the settings were intentionally altered, the peak area's relative standard deviation was less than 2%.
Assay of synthetic mixture:
Using the established approach, a synthetic combination of 50mg Tadalafil and 80mg Silodosin was evaluated. The findings showed that the concentration of Tadalafil was 98.59% and the concentration of Silodosin was 98.67%.
CONCLUSION:
The creation and successful validation of a stability-indicating RP-HPLC technique for the detection of Tadalafil and Silodosin in mixtures are described in the current study. In accordance with ICHQ2(R1) requirements, validation has been completed for Tadalafil and Silodosin34. By using RP-HPLC, it was possible to determine that the precision of Tadalafil and Silodosin was less than 2% RSD, and the accuracy of both drugs was found to be between 98.16 and 101.26 % and 98.00 and 100.14%, respectively. All other parameters were found to be within the ICH standards34. The order of stability was Base hydrolysis >Photolytic degradation >Thermal degradation >Oxidative degradation >Acid hydrolysis. Because of this, the method was precise and could be applied to ascertain the amounts of Tadalafil and Silodosin in a synthetic blend.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are thankful to Alembic Pharmaceuticals for providing standard sample of Silodosin and also thankful to Century Pharmaceuticals, Vadodara and Zydus cadila Pharmaceuticals, Ahmedabad for providing standard sample of Tadalafil.
REFERENCES:
1. Taviyad Mittal, et al., Chromatographic Method Development and Validation for Related Substance. Pharma Science Monitor. 2017; 8(2): 32-39.
2. Chirag D. Jadav, et al., Review on Stability Indicating Assay Method or Forced Degradation study: Strategy and Regulatory Consideration. 2023; 13(2): 131-139. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2023.00022.
3. Dhruvi U Parmar, et al., Strategic approach for HPLC method Development and validation: Review. 2023; 14(1): 71-76. doi: 10.52711/2231- 5659.2024.00011.
4. Shalini A. Jha, et al., Review on simultaneous equation method (Vierodt's method). Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022; 12(2). Doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2022.00026.
5. Harshal M. Vadile, et al., Recent Applications of UV-Visible Derivative Spectroscopic Method. 2023; 13(2). doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2023.00019.
6. Brijesh H Patel, et al., A brief review on q-absorption ratio method in UV-spectrophotometry. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022; 12(4): 281-285. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2022.00046
7. Sonali B. Mishra et al., A Brief Review on Liquid Chromatography- Mass Spectrometry/LCMS and its Application. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022; 12(3): 203-210. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2022.00034.
8. Anjana Vaghela, et al., Sample preparation in bioanalysis: a review. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 5(5): 6-10.
9. Md. Abid Hasan, et al., Development of Convenient and Robust Analytical Technique for HPLC-based Determination of Silodosin in Capsule Formulation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(9): 4311-7. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00666
10. Saroj Kumar Raul, et al., A RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Tadalafil in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2012; 5(12): 1573-1576.
11. Mansi Shah, Dipti Patel. Development and Characterization of tadalafil solid dispersion using skimmed milk for improved the solubility and Dissolution release profile. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(12): 6212-6217. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.01083.5
12. Prajakta H Patil, et al., Stability Indicating HPTLC Determination of Tadalafil Hydrochloride in Bulk Drug and Pharmaceutical Formulations Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(6): 2608-2614. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00464.3
13. Ashvin V. Dudhrejiya, et al., RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Mirabegron and Silodosin in Synthetic Mixture. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(9): 4247-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00656
14. Godhaniya, J.P, et al.,A review on carcinogenic impurities found in marketed drugs and strategies for its determination by analytical methods. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2021; 11(2): 159-169. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2021.00028
15. Megha Rajput, et al., Determination of genotoxic Impurity By Chromatographic Method, Pharma Science Monitor. 2017; 8(2): 24-31.
16. Anjali K. Mandavia, et al., Nitrosamine Impurity: Management of Unwelcome Guest in Pharma Market. 2023; 13(4): 303-308. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2023.00049
17. Patel S.M, et al., Stability testing: An Essential study for Vaccine Formulation Development. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2022; 2(1): 29-36. doi: 10.52711/2231-5691.2022.00006
18. Visana N.M, et al., Analytical quality by design in stress testing or stability-indicating method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2021; 11(2): 170-178. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2021.00029.
19. Gol Dhruvanshi, et al., Implementing Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) Approach for Simultaneous Estimation of Tadalafil and Macitentan by RP-HPLC Method. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2021; 11(4): 539-552. doi:10.1080/22297928.2021.1938215
20. Prajapati Krupa, et al., RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Gemifibrozil using Central composite design (CCD). Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(6): 3009-3014. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00527
21. Japanese Pharmacopoeia, The ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2017; 8th ed: 1753-1754.
22. Indian Pharmacopoeia, Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad. 2018; 8th ed: 3555-3556.
23. Muhammad Andriady et.al., leaves extract on VEGF, Interleukin-6, Prostate Index, and Histopathology in Obesity Rats with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(10): 5046-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00776
24. Gupta A and Mishra S, A Novel Analytical Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Silodosin and Tadalafil by RP-HPLC. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International. 2021; 4(1): 65-69.
25. J.V. Shaik, et al., Development of Stability-indicating UHPLC Method for The Quantitative Determination of Silodosin and Its Related Substances. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2014; 52: 646–653.
26. T.P. Aneesh and A. Rajasekaran., Development and Validation of HPLC Method for The Estimation of Silodosin in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. International Journal of Biologicaland Pharmaceutical Research. 2012; 3(5): 693-696.
27. Chiguru V, et al., LC-ESI-MS/MS Evaluation Of Forced Degradation Behavior Of Silodosin: In Vitro Anti-Cancer Activity Evaluation Of Silodosin And Major Degradation Products. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2017; 134: 1-10.
28. Harishchandran S, et al., Validated Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for The Determination of Silodosin in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Applications. 2012; 1(4): 141-145.
29. Nataraj KS, et al., Analytical Method Development and Validation for The Estimation of Silodosin and Dutasteride In Capsule Dosage Form By RP-HPLC Method. Journal Drug Metab Toxicol. 2020; 11: 245.
30. Paljashuva and N. Ramarao., Development and Validation of a Gradient RP-HPLC Method for Concurrent Analysis of Mirabegron and Silodosin in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Tablets. World Journal of Current Med and Pharm Research. 2019; 1(5): 148-163.
31. A. Chudasama, et al., A review on carcinogenic impurities found in marketed drugs and strategies for its determination by analytical methods, Asian Journal Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2021: 159-169.
32. Unnisa A,et al., RP-HPLC – PDA method development and validation for the analysis of Tadalafil in bulk, pharmaceutical dosage forms and in vitro dissolution sample. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2014; 4(12): 72- 76.
33. Bojanapu A, et al., Validation and method development of Tadalafil in bulk and tablet dosage form by RP-HPLC. Drug Research. 2015; 65: 82 – 85.
34. Chavan PA, et al., RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation of Tadalafil in Tablet Dosage form. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2021.
35. Tőtős R, József B, Validated LC-MS/MS Method For The Determination Of Tadalafil - A Competitive Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor (PDE5) – From Human Plasma. EBSCOhost. 2019.
36. Patel JK and Patel NK, Stability indicating RP- HPLC method for the determination of ambrisentan and Tadalafil in pharmaceutical dosage form. Sci Pharm. 2014; 82: 749-763.
37. Deepthi R, Sarvani G, Development and Validation of a Stability-Indicating Liquid Chromatographic Method for The Simultaneous Estimation of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil In Bulk and Its Pharmaceutical Dosage Form.
38. Pinto MA, et al., Tadalafil and Sildenafil illicit association: Stability indicating HPLC method, photodegradation kinetic and toxicological studies. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 2022.
39. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines., Q2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. 2005.
|
Received on 03.03.2024 Revised on 20.11.2024 Accepted on 23.04.2025 Published on 08.11.2025 Available online from November 13, 2025 Research J. Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(11):5288-5292. DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00762 © RJPT All right reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|